The name of Chinese coronavirus whistleblower Li Wenliang became the subject of trademark applications just hours after his high-profile death from COVID-19-related complications on 7th February, officials have confirmed today (27th February).
Chinese authorities had accused the 33-year-old Wuhan Central Hospital ophthalmologist of spreading disinformation about a new strand of coronavirus as early as December, before the government hailed him as a martyr when he became infected and died in the early hours of 7th February.
Information on Chinese enterprise database Tianyancha shows that at least two companies had applied to trademark the words ‘Li Wenliang’ or ‘Wenliang’, with one business submitting documents on the day of the medic’s death.
Changsha Fuchatang Electronic Commerce Co Ltd, in the capital of central Chinese province Hunan, applied for four trademarks in categories including food products, medicines and medical apparatuses.
The firm holds 72 trademarks and sells a range of online products such as appliances, health supplements, consumables, make-up, food products, homeware and more.
China’s Trademark Office, which is under the State Administration of Industry and Commerce in Beijing, confirmed to local media today (27th February) that the Changsha firm had lodged applications which were still pending.
However, a spokeswoman said: “It’s unlikely that we will approve them.”
Tianyancha shows similar name trademarks being sought by Dongguan Teleisi Intelligent Technology Co Ltd, based in Guangdong Province in South China, on 13th and 15th February.
But a company spokesperson denied that an application had been made, and the Trademark Office said its records showed no submissions by the business.
Changsha City’s Intellectual Property Office announced it was investigating the case with officials from the local Market Supervision and Regulation Bureau.
An official surnamed Ke told local media that the company had breached China’s Trademark Law, which forbids trademarks that undermine the morals of socialism or result in any form of negative impact.
The official added: “At any other time, applying for the trademark ‘Li Wenliang’ would not have been unlawful.
“But during the outbreak, the company’s applications on the day of Li Wenliang’s death have caused a negative social impact.
“The business’s representatives have been very cooperative during our investigation. They have deleted their applications.
“We are now determining the degree of malice in this incident, and looking into whether the company made any unlawful gains.”
The Ananova page is created by and dedicated to professional, independent freelance journalists. It is a place for us to showcase our work. When our news is sold to our media partners, we will include the link here.